Skip to content
Kraft Digital
← All insights

Notes

12 March 2026 4 min

List health is not list size

Most NZ businesses are sending to lists that are quietly costing them deliverability. Here's what to check first.

The first thing we look at on most audits isn’t the campaigns. It’s the list.

Lists accumulate. Old contacts, soft bounces that never got cleaned, role addresses, typos, exports from a previous platform, free downloads from three years ago. None of this is malicious. It’s just what happens when you’ve been sending email for a while and never had a reason to clean.

The cost shows up in two places. The first is deliverability: the more inactive contacts you keep mailing, the more inbox providers treat your sends as low-engagement. That hurts the people who actually want to hear from you. The second is decision-making. Open rates and click rates calculated on a bloated list tell you almost nothing useful.

A short checklist for businesses that haven’t audited their list in a while:

  • Inactivity windows. Anyone who hasn’t opened or clicked in 12 months is a candidate for a re-engagement flow, then suppression.
  • Hard bounces. These should be removed automatically by your platform. Worth confirming they actually are.
  • Role addresses. info@, admin@, contact@. These rarely engage, and they sit on your list polluting your numbers.
  • Source segments. Knowing how a contact got onto your list matters. Mailchimp’s “all subscribers” view obscures the difference between a high-intent signup and a free-PDF download.

Cleaning a list feels counter-intuitive. You spent years building it. But the metric you want isn’t list size. It’s the size of the engaged portion. That’s the part that buys things.